Our once safe system to access safe blood was being rigged so you could NOT get access to "safer blood", even your OWN blood, since the "COVID plan-demic" started. Autologous (self-donated blood put aside for future use, such as when you have an impending planned surgery) used to be allowed, and then overnight, our local hospitals and the Red Cross STOPPED allowing this. I know this as I was trying to do this self-donating of my own blood to prepare for two hip surgeries. Instead, I had to sign a form refusing ANY blood in the event of a critical health issue during surgery. One doctor questioned me about this, pointing out that I could die if I wasn't willing take available blood. I told her I had done my research on these COVID shots, and I knew they were NOT safe. ***
The only problem with "Safe Blood" is that they do NOT require any proof that their blood donations are actually "safe". Using the "honor system" used to be trusted, but not anymore.
Based on my research, 70% of the US took two or more COVID shots, and 80% took at least one shot. This means, here in the US, you are counting on less than 20% of the population to provide "safe blood", because the young, those with health issues, the elderly, and others who are below a safe weight, are not allowed to donate blood, for their health and safety. That probably means that maybe only 10-15% of the population is non-COVID vaccinated AND falls into a category that is safe for them to donate. This small group of people in our society who are actually capable of providing "safer blood", should actually only be reserved for those others who are also NOT COVID-vaccinated. If you have done in-depth research into the COVID plan-demic and the COVID shots, it is obvious those who fell for the COVID propaganda campaign and took that bioweapon shot, already have one foot in the grave. Sorry, I know that is harsh, but it is the truth. Just look at the almost 1,500 Adverse Events of Special Interest associated with just the Pfizer COVID shots, and you have to realize these COVID shots were NOT created to be safe or effective. They had to have been created to do severe harm, death, and to cause a shortened life expectancy.
The Adverse Events begin on page 30 of the following Pfizer document, released online ONLY following a FOIA Court Order, as both the CDC and Pfizer were trying to hide this information for 75 years. Another reason why I think this was INTENTIONAL.
I understand you make a lot more money by selling "safer blood" to everyone. But is that REALLY in the best interest of those who were allowed to see through the intense world-wide marketing propaganda campaign, and did NOT take these dangerous, experimental shots.
Isn't taking their healthy blood donation, and passing it on to those who now have HIV insertions, SV-40, Spike Proteins that cause blood clots and prion diseases, and a cancer promoter, lipid nanoparticles that may contain a bioweapon payload, and potentially thousands of other serious, health issues (as shown on the Pfizer document), actually potentially denying a healthy person from having this safe blood. Think of the continuity of HUMANITY, not your bottom line.
They do not check the blood for mRNA. I have asked. This Safe Blood makes money off the non-COVID vaccinated, who now fall into an extremely small group, this is an exceptionally small percent of people as most of the world have pushed these extremely dangerous COVID and mRNA shots on everyone.
Keep your Eye on the Prize - CHD's Petition update....
Gemini said
The primary battleground is not "conspiracy," but administrative law and biochemical manufacturing standards. The FDA’s pushback against the December 2025 petition (FDA-2025-P-6831) and its recent "Refusal-to-File" (RTF) actions in 2026 center on a few critical, high-level objections.
1. The "Standard of Care" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"CBER does not consider the application to contain a trial 'adequate and well-controlled'... because your control arm does not reflect the best-available standard of care in the United States at the time of the study." — Dr. Vinay Prasad, CBER Director, Feb 2026.
The Explanation:
This is the FDA's most aggressive new posture. They are essentially accusing manufacturers—and by extension, the petitioners' target products—of "rigging" their clinical trials. The FDA argues that for a vaccine to be truly "safe and effective" for licensure, it shouldn't just be compared to a placebo (saltwater) or a "standard" dose. Instead, it must be tested against the best current treatment available (like a high-dose flu shot for seniors). By using a "substandard" comparator in trials, the FDA claims the resulting data is scientifically "inadequate" for a full Biologics License Application (BLA).
2. The "Semantic Reclassification" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"The petitioner’s request for reclassification relies on a misinterpretation of agency guidance... mRNA vaccines function as biologics, not gene therapies, due to the lack of genomic integration." — FDA Regulatory Response (Draft), 2026.
The Explanation:
CHD’s petition hinges on the Accardi Doctrine, which legally requires an agency to follow its own rules. CHD points to FDA guidance defining products that "transfer genetic material" as Gene Therapy. The FDA’s objection is a technical "firewall": they argue that "Gene Therapy" requires a permanent change to the host’s DNA. Since mRNA is "transient" (it disappears after a few days and doesn't enter the cell nucleus), the FDA contends it is exempt from the much stricter, multi-decade safety monitoring required for Gene Therapies.
3. The "Process 1 vs. Process 2" Manufacturing Objection
The Direct Quote:
"CBER reviews process and method validation consistent with a product lifecycle approach... minor manufacturing changes supported by data showing comparability [do not require] overly stringent and onerous comparability data." — FDA Guidance on Manufacturing Flexibilities, Jan 2026.
The Explanation:
This addresses Sasha Latypova’s core evidence. She argues that the "clean" batches used in trials (Process 1) were fundamentally different from the "mass-produced" batches given to the public (Process 2), which she claims were contaminated with residual DNA. The FDA’s objection is that they allow for "manufacturing flexibilities." They argue that as long as the manufacturer can show the end products are "comparable" enough, they don't need to redo the clinical trials. They view Latypova’s demand for new trials for every manufacturing change as "onerous" and unnecessary for public health.
4. The "Administrative Circumvention" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"The Citizen Petition process should not be used to circumvent the administrative order process... The proposed revocations should be rejected as they would inappropriately intervene in the practice of medicine." — FDA Notice of Action, late 2025.
The Explanation:
The FDA often objects to the format of these petitions. They argue that a Citizen Petition is meant for small, specific changes (like a warning label), not for the "summary revocation" of a multi-billion dollar license. They view the petition as an attempt to "short-circuit" the law. By framing the petition as a "political" or "practice of medicine" issue rather than a "safety" issue, the FDA can legally dismiss it without ever having to hold a public hearing on the actual manufacturing data.
----
In this case the Judge is the Defendant it appears.
Yes, I am well aware of CHD's Petition and all the other points that you wrote about.
I have submitted comments in support for multiple "official" petitions to the FDA, including CHD's Petition.
I am also supporting "unofficial" petitions that with strong enough public support, might help provide cover for some politicians to finally do the right thing.
These diabolical mRNA transfection bioweapons MUST be recalled and the inherently dangerous and deadly mRNA transfection platform MUST be banned.
Here's the comment that I submitted (a couple of months ago) for this "official" petition to the FDA:
I fully support the petition filed on behalf of Children’s Health Defense requesting that FDA revoke all licensure for COVID-19 mRNA "vaccines" as improperly granted.
The mRNA transfection platform itself is irreparably flawed & inherently dangerous and the platform itself IS the primary problem.
The mechanism of action (using mRNA instructions to turn one’s own cells into foreign non-self “spike protein factories”) IS the primary mechanism of harm. This triggers an immune system attack response, starting with the Killer T-Lymphocyte cells which will target & destroy one's formerly healthy cells, ANYWHERE in the body, that are now expressing non-self proteins...starting a cascade of damage at the deepest biological/cellular level.
Due to the systemic biodistribution properties of the (toxic & inflammatory) lipid nanoparticles, the encased (designed to be long-lasting) n1-methyl pseudouridine modified mRNA can go anywhere in the body, including crossing the blood-brain & placental barriers. The LNP "delivery vehicles" traveled to different parts of the body in different people.
Expressing any foreign non-self protein is fatal to the cell doing the expressing.
Some people will express lots of foreign proteins in vulnerable locations.
Others express less in less vulnerable areas.
The location of expression defines the adverse event: if you get foreign protein expression in your heart cells, you could get myocarditis & experience cardiac arrest; if the expression is in your brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nervous system, you could get one or more of a variety of neurological conditions; if in your eye, possible blindness; if in your ovaries, possible infertility; if in the placenta, possible miscarriage, stillbirth, or birth defects; if in the endothelial cells that line your blood vessels, possible vascular &/or microvascular injuries like clots/microclots or the long white fibrous clots, leading to strokes, heart attacks, or pulmonary embolisms…
If the expression of foreign proteins is in your own immune cells, you could experience immune dysfunction, dysregulation, & suppression including repeated infections, immune tolerance of a pathogenic foreign protein due to antibody subclass switch to IgG4 & increased IgG4-related diseases, T cell exhaustion, interference with & suppression of innate immunity, persistent systemic inflammation, dysregulation of toll-like receptors and reduced cancer surveillance or the suppression of tumor-suppressing immune system activities & cell-signaling (increasing your risk of fast-growing and aggressive cancers). And more…
Pathology reports, including from autopsies, have revealed & confirmed the Killer T Lymphocyte infiltration & destruction of cells, oftentimes in vital organs.
These modified mRNA-LNP genetic transfection injections never would have passed proper safety studies required for gene therapy products. Safety studies (including biodistribution, immunogenicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, shedding, long-term effects, & more) that were bypassed because of the mislabeling as “vaccines”. (And because of the EUA & “countermeasure” designations under the Project BioShield Act & PREP Act).
The danger is NOT limited to just getting more COVID “boosters”. ANY mRNA gene “therapy” product that transfects your cells & instructs those cells to produce non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) will trigger an immune system attack response against your own cells & tissues. This makes EVERY mRNA-based transfection product harmful by design.
This immune response to one's own cells being instructed to express non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) triggers autoimmune responses, & then T-cell exhaustion & immune system dysfunction, regardless of whether or not the foreign protein is toxic itself.
The immune dysfunction & collapse that has manifested in an unprecedented number of people worldwide, accompanied by surges in autoimmune conditions, chronic infections, cancers, & cardiometabolic disease is unfortunately very real, no matter how much some want to deny what is happening.
This is not speculation. This is measurable — in lymphocyte counts, antibody profiles, T-cell exhaustion markers, & verified clinical outcomes, including deaths.
AND shedding from these mRNA transfection injections IS an extremely serious concern, with some people being affected more than others.
I had the pleasure of meeting you and Dr. McCollough as well as Dr. Bhattacharya when you visited here a few years back.
I’m so grateful that you are discussing this important topic!
Last we spoke I had been telling you and Dr. McCollough about my situation regarding having to get a colonoscopy and because I’m on blood thinners due to a stent in my heart, the doctor wants to have blood on hand in case I bleed out!
As I had mentioned to you and Dr. McCollough, I approached the Doctor performing the procedure and asked if I could have a friend or family member donate their blood or perhaps I could donate my own blood prior to the colonoscopy.
The response I got was that it was against protocol to allow that and that the only blood I would receive is the tainted blood from the blood bank!
Because I have heart issues to begin with there is no way that I am willing to be exposed to the blood bank blood due to the spike protein!
It has been 3 years now that they have kept me on a waiting list for my procedure!
3 years ago they found blood in my stool sample.
The doctor said I had an option to sign a waiver as the Jehovah Witness people often do so that I would not be given any blood if there were any complications.
I asked the doctor what would happen if I bleed out and he said “then I would die!”
I told him that I didn’t want to die and he said “then don’t sign the paperwork!”
Such a dilemma and tough predicament that I still find myself in!
Even if I received blood from safe blood I’m pretty sure that the doctor up here in Canada would not allow me to have it if there were complications!
If you or Dr. McCollough have any advice for me I would very much appreciate it!
A recent interview between Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt and Maria Crisler, pathologist extraordinaire, looked at the issues involved with synthetic blood products, particularly with synthetic white blood cells, self-assembling nanoparticles, and the issues they are creating.
(being used since 2020). Very clear evidence is provided with photographs from an electron microscope. Besides requesting safe blood, we also now have to demand NO SYNTHETIC blood products... Available at Sophia Health Talks by subscription.
Keep your Eye on the Prize - CHD's Petition update....
Gemini said
The primary battleground is not "conspiracy," but administrative law and biochemical manufacturing standards. The FDA’s pushback against the December 2025 petition (FDA-2025-P-6831) and its recent "Refusal-to-File" (RTF) actions in 2026 center on a few critical, high-level objections.
1. The "Standard of Care" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"CBER does not consider the application to contain a trial 'adequate and well-controlled'... because your control arm does not reflect the best-available standard of care in the United States at the time of the study." — Dr. Vinay Prasad, CBER Director, Feb 2026.
The Explanation:
This is the FDA's most aggressive new posture. They are essentially accusing manufacturers—and by extension, the petitioners' target products—of "rigging" their clinical trials. The FDA argues that for a vaccine to be truly "safe and effective" for licensure, it shouldn't just be compared to a placebo (saltwater) or a "standard" dose. Instead, it must be tested against the best current treatment available (like a high-dose flu shot for seniors). By using a "substandard" comparator in trials, the FDA claims the resulting data is scientifically "inadequate" for a full Biologics License Application (BLA).
2. The "Semantic Reclassification" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"The petitioner’s request for reclassification relies on a misinterpretation of agency guidance... mRNA vaccines function as biologics, not gene therapies, due to the lack of genomic integration." — FDA Regulatory Response (Draft), 2026.
The Explanation:
CHD’s petition hinges on the Accardi Doctrine, which legally requires an agency to follow its own rules. CHD points to FDA guidance defining products that "transfer genetic material" as Gene Therapy. The FDA’s objection is a technical "firewall": they argue that "Gene Therapy" requires a permanent change to the host’s DNA. Since mRNA is "transient" (it disappears after a few days and doesn't enter the cell nucleus), the FDA contends it is exempt from the much stricter, multi-decade safety monitoring required for Gene Therapies.
3. The "Process 1 vs. Process 2" Manufacturing Objection
The Direct Quote:
"CBER reviews process and method validation consistent with a product lifecycle approach... minor manufacturing changes supported by data showing comparability [do not require] overly stringent and onerous comparability data." — FDA Guidance on Manufacturing Flexibilities, Jan 2026.
The Explanation:
This addresses Sasha Latypova’s core evidence. She argues that the "clean" batches used in trials (Process 1) were fundamentally different from the "mass-produced" batches given to the public (Process 2), which she claims were contaminated with residual DNA. The FDA’s objection is that they allow for "manufacturing flexibilities." They argue that as long as the manufacturer can show the end products are "comparable" enough, they don't need to redo the clinical trials. They view Latypova’s demand for new trials for every manufacturing change as "onerous" and unnecessary for public health.
4. The "Administrative Circumvention" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"The Citizen Petition process should not be used to circumvent the administrative order process... The proposed revocations should be rejected as they would inappropriately intervene in the practice of medicine." — FDA Notice of Action, late 2025.
The Explanation:
The FDA often objects to the format of these petitions. They argue that a Citizen Petition is meant for small, specific changes (like a warning label), not for the "summary revocation" of a multi-billion dollar license. They view the petition as an attempt to "short-circuit" the law. By framing the petition as a "political" or "practice of medicine" issue rather than a "safety" issue, the FDA can legally dismiss it without ever having to hold a public hearing on the actual manufacturing data.
----
In this case the Judge is the Defendant it appears.
Thanks for the alert. I think we assumed that when updates to the site were made, the updating was automatic. The News section is regularly updated, for example.
they didn't talk about giving it how to give to"safe blood" also wondering about the experience of safe blood. hope your wife is doing better Tom. prayers and good healing energy sent your way
Clinton - I find it fascinating that Dr Drew has interviewed you and talked about our blood supply being tainted, yet he has not interviewed Tom Haviland - despite Tom having an actual phone conversation with Dr. Kelly Victory.
If it is indeed his account, Dr. Drew is a follower of our Substack.
God bless Safe Blood, the employees, donors, donees and Clinton. This organization is a gift from God as we defend our bodies which are the temples God created.
So important to make sure you get clean SV40 and mRNA free blood.
This is a war and they’re out to poison you.
Please look on Substack for , Dr. Ana M. Mihalcea
Our once safe system to access safe blood was being rigged so you could NOT get access to "safer blood", even your OWN blood, since the "COVID plan-demic" started. Autologous (self-donated blood put aside for future use, such as when you have an impending planned surgery) used to be allowed, and then overnight, our local hospitals and the Red Cross STOPPED allowing this. I know this as I was trying to do this self-donating of my own blood to prepare for two hip surgeries. Instead, I had to sign a form refusing ANY blood in the event of a critical health issue during surgery. One doctor questioned me about this, pointing out that I could die if I wasn't willing take available blood. I told her I had done my research on these COVID shots, and I knew they were NOT safe. ***
The only problem with "Safe Blood" is that they do NOT require any proof that their blood donations are actually "safe". Using the "honor system" used to be trusted, but not anymore.
Based on my research, 70% of the US took two or more COVID shots, and 80% took at least one shot. This means, here in the US, you are counting on less than 20% of the population to provide "safe blood", because the young, those with health issues, the elderly, and others who are below a safe weight, are not allowed to donate blood, for their health and safety. That probably means that maybe only 10-15% of the population is non-COVID vaccinated AND falls into a category that is safe for them to donate. This small group of people in our society who are actually capable of providing "safer blood", should actually only be reserved for those others who are also NOT COVID-vaccinated. If you have done in-depth research into the COVID plan-demic and the COVID shots, it is obvious those who fell for the COVID propaganda campaign and took that bioweapon shot, already have one foot in the grave. Sorry, I know that is harsh, but it is the truth. Just look at the almost 1,500 Adverse Events of Special Interest associated with just the Pfizer COVID shots, and you have to realize these COVID shots were NOT created to be safe or effective. They had to have been created to do severe harm, death, and to cause a shortened life expectancy.
The Adverse Events begin on page 30 of the following Pfizer document, released online ONLY following a FOIA Court Order, as both the CDC and Pfizer were trying to hide this information for 75 years. Another reason why I think this was INTENTIONAL.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
I understand you make a lot more money by selling "safer blood" to everyone. But is that REALLY in the best interest of those who were allowed to see through the intense world-wide marketing propaganda campaign, and did NOT take these dangerous, experimental shots.
Isn't taking their healthy blood donation, and passing it on to those who now have HIV insertions, SV-40, Spike Proteins that cause blood clots and prion diseases, and a cancer promoter, lipid nanoparticles that may contain a bioweapon payload, and potentially thousands of other serious, health issues (as shown on the Pfizer document), actually potentially denying a healthy person from having this safe blood. Think of the continuity of HUMANITY, not your bottom line.
This is a serious moral issue!
They do not check the blood for mRNA. I have asked. This Safe Blood makes money off the non-COVID vaccinated, who now fall into an extremely small group, this is an exceptionally small percent of people as most of the world have pushed these extremely dangerous COVID and mRNA shots on everyone.
https://dutytodissent.substack.com/p/we-the-people-demand-a-moratorium
Please sign and share the petition for moratorium on the mRNA/modRNA genetic transfection technology platform:
https://www.change.org/mRNAmoratorium
Keep your Eye on the Prize - CHD's Petition update....
Gemini said
The primary battleground is not "conspiracy," but administrative law and biochemical manufacturing standards. The FDA’s pushback against the December 2025 petition (FDA-2025-P-6831) and its recent "Refusal-to-File" (RTF) actions in 2026 center on a few critical, high-level objections.
1. The "Standard of Care" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"CBER does not consider the application to contain a trial 'adequate and well-controlled'... because your control arm does not reflect the best-available standard of care in the United States at the time of the study." — Dr. Vinay Prasad, CBER Director, Feb 2026.
The Explanation:
This is the FDA's most aggressive new posture. They are essentially accusing manufacturers—and by extension, the petitioners' target products—of "rigging" their clinical trials. The FDA argues that for a vaccine to be truly "safe and effective" for licensure, it shouldn't just be compared to a placebo (saltwater) or a "standard" dose. Instead, it must be tested against the best current treatment available (like a high-dose flu shot for seniors). By using a "substandard" comparator in trials, the FDA claims the resulting data is scientifically "inadequate" for a full Biologics License Application (BLA).
2. The "Semantic Reclassification" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"The petitioner’s request for reclassification relies on a misinterpretation of agency guidance... mRNA vaccines function as biologics, not gene therapies, due to the lack of genomic integration." — FDA Regulatory Response (Draft), 2026.
The Explanation:
CHD’s petition hinges on the Accardi Doctrine, which legally requires an agency to follow its own rules. CHD points to FDA guidance defining products that "transfer genetic material" as Gene Therapy. The FDA’s objection is a technical "firewall": they argue that "Gene Therapy" requires a permanent change to the host’s DNA. Since mRNA is "transient" (it disappears after a few days and doesn't enter the cell nucleus), the FDA contends it is exempt from the much stricter, multi-decade safety monitoring required for Gene Therapies.
3. The "Process 1 vs. Process 2" Manufacturing Objection
The Direct Quote:
"CBER reviews process and method validation consistent with a product lifecycle approach... minor manufacturing changes supported by data showing comparability [do not require] overly stringent and onerous comparability data." — FDA Guidance on Manufacturing Flexibilities, Jan 2026.
The Explanation:
This addresses Sasha Latypova’s core evidence. She argues that the "clean" batches used in trials (Process 1) were fundamentally different from the "mass-produced" batches given to the public (Process 2), which she claims were contaminated with residual DNA. The FDA’s objection is that they allow for "manufacturing flexibilities." They argue that as long as the manufacturer can show the end products are "comparable" enough, they don't need to redo the clinical trials. They view Latypova’s demand for new trials for every manufacturing change as "onerous" and unnecessary for public health.
4. The "Administrative Circumvention" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"The Citizen Petition process should not be used to circumvent the administrative order process... The proposed revocations should be rejected as they would inappropriately intervene in the practice of medicine." — FDA Notice of Action, late 2025.
The Explanation:
The FDA often objects to the format of these petitions. They argue that a Citizen Petition is meant for small, specific changes (like a warning label), not for the "summary revocation" of a multi-billion dollar license. They view the petition as an attempt to "short-circuit" the law. By framing the petition as a "political" or "practice of medicine" issue rather than a "safety" issue, the FDA can legally dismiss it without ever having to hold a public hearing on the actual manufacturing data.
----
In this case the Judge is the Defendant it appears.
The FDA needs to recuse itself.
Yes, I am well aware of CHD's Petition and all the other points that you wrote about.
I have submitted comments in support for multiple "official" petitions to the FDA, including CHD's Petition.
I am also supporting "unofficial" petitions that with strong enough public support, might help provide cover for some politicians to finally do the right thing.
These diabolical mRNA transfection bioweapons MUST be recalled and the inherently dangerous and deadly mRNA transfection platform MUST be banned.
https://tdefender.substack.com/p/chd-asks-fda-to-revoke-covid-vaccine-licenses-petition
Here's the direct link to submit a comment to the FDA about CHD's petition:
https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2025-P-6831-0001
Here's the comment that I submitted (a couple of months ago) for this "official" petition to the FDA:
I fully support the petition filed on behalf of Children’s Health Defense requesting that FDA revoke all licensure for COVID-19 mRNA "vaccines" as improperly granted.
The mRNA transfection platform itself is irreparably flawed & inherently dangerous and the platform itself IS the primary problem.
The mechanism of action (using mRNA instructions to turn one’s own cells into foreign non-self “spike protein factories”) IS the primary mechanism of harm. This triggers an immune system attack response, starting with the Killer T-Lymphocyte cells which will target & destroy one's formerly healthy cells, ANYWHERE in the body, that are now expressing non-self proteins...starting a cascade of damage at the deepest biological/cellular level.
Due to the systemic biodistribution properties of the (toxic & inflammatory) lipid nanoparticles, the encased (designed to be long-lasting) n1-methyl pseudouridine modified mRNA can go anywhere in the body, including crossing the blood-brain & placental barriers. The LNP "delivery vehicles" traveled to different parts of the body in different people.
Expressing any foreign non-self protein is fatal to the cell doing the expressing.
Some people will express lots of foreign proteins in vulnerable locations.
Others express less in less vulnerable areas.
The location of expression defines the adverse event: if you get foreign protein expression in your heart cells, you could get myocarditis & experience cardiac arrest; if the expression is in your brain, spinal cord, or peripheral nervous system, you could get one or more of a variety of neurological conditions; if in your eye, possible blindness; if in your ovaries, possible infertility; if in the placenta, possible miscarriage, stillbirth, or birth defects; if in the endothelial cells that line your blood vessels, possible vascular &/or microvascular injuries like clots/microclots or the long white fibrous clots, leading to strokes, heart attacks, or pulmonary embolisms…
If the expression of foreign proteins is in your own immune cells, you could experience immune dysfunction, dysregulation, & suppression including repeated infections, immune tolerance of a pathogenic foreign protein due to antibody subclass switch to IgG4 & increased IgG4-related diseases, T cell exhaustion, interference with & suppression of innate immunity, persistent systemic inflammation, dysregulation of toll-like receptors and reduced cancer surveillance or the suppression of tumor-suppressing immune system activities & cell-signaling (increasing your risk of fast-growing and aggressive cancers). And more…
Pathology reports, including from autopsies, have revealed & confirmed the Killer T Lymphocyte infiltration & destruction of cells, oftentimes in vital organs.
These modified mRNA-LNP genetic transfection injections never would have passed proper safety studies required for gene therapy products. Safety studies (including biodistribution, immunogenicity, immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, shedding, long-term effects, & more) that were bypassed because of the mislabeling as “vaccines”. (And because of the EUA & “countermeasure” designations under the Project BioShield Act & PREP Act).
The danger is NOT limited to just getting more COVID “boosters”. ANY mRNA gene “therapy” product that transfects your cells & instructs those cells to produce non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) will trigger an immune system attack response against your own cells & tissues. This makes EVERY mRNA-based transfection product harmful by design.
This immune response to one's own cells being instructed to express non-self proteins (ANY non-self protein) triggers autoimmune responses, & then T-cell exhaustion & immune system dysfunction, regardless of whether or not the foreign protein is toxic itself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDFUymH-9W8
https://entwine.substack.com/p/the-platform-is-deadly
https://robertchandler.substack.com/p/vaccinated-dead-kruger-lang-morz
https://x.com/newstart_2024/status/1981375686251069797
https://zenodo.org/records/15787612
The immune dysfunction & collapse that has manifested in an unprecedented number of people worldwide, accompanied by surges in autoimmune conditions, chronic infections, cancers, & cardiometabolic disease is unfortunately very real, no matter how much some want to deny what is happening.
This is not speculation. This is measurable — in lymphocyte counts, antibody profiles, T-cell exhaustion markers, & verified clinical outcomes, including deaths.
AND shedding from these mRNA transfection injections IS an extremely serious concern, with some people being affected more than others.
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of
https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/shedding-of-covid-mrna-vaccine-components
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-pfizer-mrna-found
The COVID mRNA transfection shots must be recalled.
a thousand percent… the sad thing is the objections they are pushing back with.
the same game everytime.
maybe the pandemic culls were just there to out who is in charge for the Second Culling lol…
I vote Tosh.0 for Mao - we really need an academic purge and a return to farming :D
Hi Dr. Drew!
This is Jas Sidhu from Victoria BC!🇨🇦
Hope all is well with you and your wife!
I had the pleasure of meeting you and Dr. McCollough as well as Dr. Bhattacharya when you visited here a few years back.
I’m so grateful that you are discussing this important topic!
Last we spoke I had been telling you and Dr. McCollough about my situation regarding having to get a colonoscopy and because I’m on blood thinners due to a stent in my heart, the doctor wants to have blood on hand in case I bleed out!
As I had mentioned to you and Dr. McCollough, I approached the Doctor performing the procedure and asked if I could have a friend or family member donate their blood or perhaps I could donate my own blood prior to the colonoscopy.
The response I got was that it was against protocol to allow that and that the only blood I would receive is the tainted blood from the blood bank!
Because I have heart issues to begin with there is no way that I am willing to be exposed to the blood bank blood due to the spike protein!
It has been 3 years now that they have kept me on a waiting list for my procedure!
3 years ago they found blood in my stool sample.
The doctor said I had an option to sign a waiver as the Jehovah Witness people often do so that I would not be given any blood if there were any complications.
I asked the doctor what would happen if I bleed out and he said “then I would die!”
I told him that I didn’t want to die and he said “then don’t sign the paperwork!”
Such a dilemma and tough predicament that I still find myself in!
Even if I received blood from safe blood I’m pretty sure that the doctor up here in Canada would not allow me to have it if there were complications!
If you or Dr. McCollough have any advice for me I would very much appreciate it!
Please let Peter know that Jas says hello!
Thank you so much for all you are doing!
🙏🏾❤️🙏🏾
A recent interview between Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt and Maria Crisler, pathologist extraordinaire, looked at the issues involved with synthetic blood products, particularly with synthetic white blood cells, self-assembling nanoparticles, and the issues they are creating.
(being used since 2020). Very clear evidence is provided with photographs from an electron microscope. Besides requesting safe blood, we also now have to demand NO SYNTHETIC blood products... Available at Sophia Health Talks by subscription.
Keep your Eye on the Prize - CHD's Petition update....
Gemini said
The primary battleground is not "conspiracy," but administrative law and biochemical manufacturing standards. The FDA’s pushback against the December 2025 petition (FDA-2025-P-6831) and its recent "Refusal-to-File" (RTF) actions in 2026 center on a few critical, high-level objections.
1. The "Standard of Care" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"CBER does not consider the application to contain a trial 'adequate and well-controlled'... because your control arm does not reflect the best-available standard of care in the United States at the time of the study." — Dr. Vinay Prasad, CBER Director, Feb 2026.
The Explanation:
This is the FDA's most aggressive new posture. They are essentially accusing manufacturers—and by extension, the petitioners' target products—of "rigging" their clinical trials. The FDA argues that for a vaccine to be truly "safe and effective" for licensure, it shouldn't just be compared to a placebo (saltwater) or a "standard" dose. Instead, it must be tested against the best current treatment available (like a high-dose flu shot for seniors). By using a "substandard" comparator in trials, the FDA claims the resulting data is scientifically "inadequate" for a full Biologics License Application (BLA).
2. The "Semantic Reclassification" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"The petitioner’s request for reclassification relies on a misinterpretation of agency guidance... mRNA vaccines function as biologics, not gene therapies, due to the lack of genomic integration." — FDA Regulatory Response (Draft), 2026.
The Explanation:
CHD’s petition hinges on the Accardi Doctrine, which legally requires an agency to follow its own rules. CHD points to FDA guidance defining products that "transfer genetic material" as Gene Therapy. The FDA’s objection is a technical "firewall": they argue that "Gene Therapy" requires a permanent change to the host’s DNA. Since mRNA is "transient" (it disappears after a few days and doesn't enter the cell nucleus), the FDA contends it is exempt from the much stricter, multi-decade safety monitoring required for Gene Therapies.
3. The "Process 1 vs. Process 2" Manufacturing Objection
The Direct Quote:
"CBER reviews process and method validation consistent with a product lifecycle approach... minor manufacturing changes supported by data showing comparability [do not require] overly stringent and onerous comparability data." — FDA Guidance on Manufacturing Flexibilities, Jan 2026.
The Explanation:
This addresses Sasha Latypova’s core evidence. She argues that the "clean" batches used in trials (Process 1) were fundamentally different from the "mass-produced" batches given to the public (Process 2), which she claims were contaminated with residual DNA. The FDA’s objection is that they allow for "manufacturing flexibilities." They argue that as long as the manufacturer can show the end products are "comparable" enough, they don't need to redo the clinical trials. They view Latypova’s demand for new trials for every manufacturing change as "onerous" and unnecessary for public health.
4. The "Administrative Circumvention" Objection
The Direct Quote:
"The Citizen Petition process should not be used to circumvent the administrative order process... The proposed revocations should be rejected as they would inappropriately intervene in the practice of medicine." — FDA Notice of Action, late 2025.
The Explanation:
The FDA often objects to the format of these petitions. They argue that a Citizen Petition is meant for small, specific changes (like a warning label), not for the "summary revocation" of a multi-billion dollar license. They view the petition as an attempt to "short-circuit" the law. By framing the petition as a "political" or "practice of medicine" issue rather than a "safety" issue, the FDA can legally dismiss it without ever having to hold a public hearing on the actual manufacturing data.
----
In this case the Judge is the Defendant it appears.
The FDA needs to recuse itself.
Why has SafeBlood.com not been updated since 2023? I literally thought you guys went out of business, until I just saw Tom Renz talking about you.
Thanks for the alert. I think we assumed that when updates to the site were made, the updating was automatic. The News section is regularly updated, for example.
Duly noted. Adding you guys back to Exit the Matrix! TinyURL.com/ExitTheMatrixSept2025
So is there a place to donate one’s mRNA vaccine free blood.?????
they didn't talk about giving it how to give to"safe blood" also wondering about the experience of safe blood. hope your wife is doing better Tom. prayers and good healing energy sent your way
azt killed
Clinton - I find it fascinating that Dr Drew has interviewed you and talked about our blood supply being tainted, yet he has not interviewed Tom Haviland - despite Tom having an actual phone conversation with Dr. Kelly Victory.
If it is indeed his account, Dr. Drew is a follower of our Substack.
God bless Safe Blood, the employees, donors, donees and Clinton. This organization is a gift from God as we defend our bodies which are the temples God created.